Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder string field reprogramming" » "coder coder string cell reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder string direct reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder string cells reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder cordel string field reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder closed string field reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder modelo string field reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder stress field reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder using field reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder decoder string field reprogramming" (Expand search), "code code string field reprogramming" (Expand search), "decoder codec string field reprogramming" (Expand search)
"in python pythin python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder string field reprogramming") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder string field reprogramming\") OR (\"in python pythin python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder string field reprogramming ) OR ( in python pythin python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder string field reprogramming") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))*.