Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder string field processing" » "coder coder string feed processing" (Expand search), "coder coder string food processing" (Expand search), "coder coder string seed processing" (Expand search), "coder cordel string field processing" (Expand search), "coder closed string field processing" (Expand search), "coder modelo string field processing" (Expand search), "coder coder stress field processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder string field processing" (Expand search), "code code string field processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec string field processing" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder string field processing") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder string field processing\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder string field processing ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder string field processing") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.