Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder string at processing" » "coder coder string meat processing" (Expand search), "coder coder string heat processing" (Expand search), "coder coder string wet processing" (Expand search), "coder cordel string at processing" (Expand search), "coder closed string at processing" (Expand search), "coder modelo string at processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder string at processing" (Expand search), "code code string at processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec string at processing" (Expand search), "coder coder string art processing" (Expand search), "coder coder storing at processing" (Expand search), "coder coder spring at processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder string at processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder string at processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder string at processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder string at processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.