Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sparse prediction process" » "coder coder sparse production process" (Expand search), "coder coder sparse reduction process" (Expand search), "coder coder sparse predictive process" (Expand search), "coder coder space prediction process" (Expand search), "coder coder state prediction process" (Expand search), "coder coder score prediction process" (Expand search), "coder over sparse prediction process" (Expand search), "coder under sparse prediction process" (Expand search), "coder novel sparse prediction process" (Expand search), "coder decoder sparse prediction process" (Expand search), "code code sparse prediction process" (Expand search), "decoder codec sparse prediction process" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sparse prediction process") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sparse prediction process\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sparse prediction process ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sparse prediction process") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.