Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sparse dinamic programming" » "coder coder sparse dynamic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sparse genetic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sparse conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder passe dinamica programming" (Expand search), "coder over sparse dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coder under sparse dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coder novel sparse dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder sparse dinamic programming" (Expand search), "code code sparse dinamic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec sparse dinamic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sparse dinamic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sparse dinamic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sparse dinamic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sparse dinamic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.