Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sparse coding process" » "coder coder sparse coping process" (Expand search), "coder coder sparse coking process" (Expand search), "coder coder sparse decoding process" (Expand search), "coder over sparse coding process" (Expand search), "coder under sparse coding process" (Expand search), "coder novel sparse coding process" (Expand search), "coder decoder sparse coding process" (Expand search), "code code sparse coding process" (Expand search), "decoder codec sparse coding process" (Expand search)
"in pitons python python programming" » "in pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in pigeons python python programming" (Expand search), "in picos python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sparse coding process") OR ("in pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sparse coding process\") OR (\"in pitons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sparse coding process ) OR ( in pitons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sparse coding process") OR ("in pitons python python programming"))*.