Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sparse coding problem" » "coder coder sparse coding problems" (Expand search), "coder coder sparse coping problem" (Expand search), "coder coder sparse loading problem" (Expand search), "coder over sparse coding problem" (Expand search), "coder under sparse coding problem" (Expand search), "coder novel sparse coding problem" (Expand search), "coder decoder sparse coding problem" (Expand search), "code code sparse coding problem" (Expand search), "decoder codec sparse coding problem" (Expand search)
"in picos python python programming" » "in picos pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in picos piton python programming" (Expand search), "in picos pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pacote python python programming" (Expand search), "in pieces python python programming" (Expand search), "in pigs python python programming" (Expand search), "in pinus python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sparse coding problem") OR ("in picos python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sparse coding problem\") OR (\"in picos python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sparse coding problem ) OR ( in picos python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sparse coding problem") OR ("in picos python python programming"))*.