Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder smoking rise program" » "coder gender smoking rise program" (Expand search), "coder smoker smoking rise program" (Expand search), "coder cold smoking rise program" (Expand search), "coder coder smoking risk program" (Expand search), "coder coder smoking noise program" (Expand search), "coder coder smoking risks program" (Expand search), "coder coder smoking prime program" (Expand search), "coder coder smoking life program" (Expand search), "coder coder smoking lease program" (Expand search), "coder decoder smoking rise program" (Expand search), "code code smoking rise program" (Expand search), "decoder codec smoking rise program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder smoking rise program\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder smoking rise program ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder smoking rise program") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.