Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder single application proposal" » "coder coder single application protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder single application protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder single application program" (Expand search), "coder coder scale application proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder mobile application proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder possible application proposal" (Expand search), "coder under single application proposal" (Expand search), "coder power single application proposal" (Expand search), "coder mode single application proposal" (Expand search), "coder decoder single application proposal" (Expand search), "code code single application proposal" (Expand search), "decoder codec single application proposal" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder single application proposal") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder single application proposal\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder single application proposal ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder single application proposal") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.