Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder setting time object" » "coder modern setting time object" (Expand search), "coder power setting time object" (Expand search), "coder power settings time object" (Expand search), "coder coder sitting time object" (Expand search), "coder coder setting the object" (Expand search), "coder coder setting in object" (Expand search), "coder decoder setting time object" (Expand search), "code code setting time object" (Expand search), "decoder codec setting time object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder setting time object") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder setting time object\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder setting time object ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder setting time object") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.