Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sequence implications programming" » "coder coder sequence applications programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sequence application programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sequence application programing" (Expand search), "coder coder sequences implications programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sequencing implications programming" (Expand search), "coder coder frequency implications programming" (Expand search), "coder order sequence implications programming" (Expand search), "coder under sequence implications programming" (Expand search), "coder leader sequence implications programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder sequence implications programming" (Expand search), "code code sequence implications programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec sequence implications programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sequence implications programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sequence implications programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sequence implications programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sequence implications programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.