Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sequence dependent programming" » "coder coder sequence independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sequence dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder sequence element programming" (Expand search), "coder order sequence dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder under sequence dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder leader sequence dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder sequence dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code sequence dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec sequence dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sequence dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sequence dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sequence dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sequence dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.