Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sensing using objects" » "coder fiber sensing using objects" (Expand search), "coder water sensing using objects" (Expand search), "coder index sensing using objects" (Expand search), "coder coder sensors using objects" (Expand search), "coder coder sensor using objects" (Expand search), "coder coder sensing using object" (Expand search), "coder coder sensing using objective" (Expand search), "coder coder sensing cutting objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder sensing using objects" (Expand search), "code code sensing using objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec sensing using objects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sensing using objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sensing using objects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sensing using objects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sensing using objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.