Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder seeking plc programming" » "coder coder seeking c programming" (Expand search), "coder coder seeking block programming" (Expand search), "coder coder seeking _ programming" (Expand search), "coder order seeking plc programming" (Expand search), "coder power seeking plc programming" (Expand search), "coder leader seeking plc programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder seeking plc programming" (Expand search), "code code seeking plc programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec seeking plc programming" (Expand search), "coder coder seeking policy programming" (Expand search), "coder coder seeking public programming" (Expand search), "coder coder seeking help programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder seeking plc programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder seeking plc programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder seeking plc programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder seeking plc programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.