Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder second making objects" » "coder coder second talking objects" (Expand search), "coder coder second imaging objects" (Expand search), "coder coder second moving objects" (Expand search), "coder coder second mating objects" (Expand search), "coder coder second laying objects" (Expand search), "coder coder second calving objects" (Expand search), "coder modern second making objects" (Expand search), "coder border second making objects" (Expand search), "coder lower second making objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder second making objects" (Expand search), "code code second making objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec second making objects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder second making objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder second making objects ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder second making objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.