Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder science dependent programming" » "coder coder science independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder science dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder science element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sequence dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder valence dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder paciente dependente programming" (Expand search), "coder modern science dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder closer science dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder color science dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder science dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code science dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec science dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder science dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder science dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder science dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder science dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.