Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder scanning confocal programming" » "coder coder scanning conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder scanning control programming" (Expand search), "coder coder scanning cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder cooker scanning confocal programming" (Expand search), "coder under scanning confocal programming" (Expand search), "coder core scanning confocal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder scanning confocal programming" (Expand search), "code code scanning confocal programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec scanning confocal programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder scanning confocal programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder scanning confocal programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder scanning confocal programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder scanning confocal programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.