Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling wastes processing" » "coder coder sampling waste processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling fast processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling wastes process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling rates processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling systems processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling based processing" (Expand search), "coder under sampling wastes processing" (Expand search), "coder over sampling wastes processing" (Expand search), "coder core sampling wastes processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling wastes processing" (Expand search), "code code sampling wastes processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling wastes processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling wastes processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling wastes processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling wastes processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling wastes processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.