Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling via process" » "coder under sampling via process" (Expand search), "coder over sampling via process" (Expand search), "coder core sampling via process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling bias process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling in process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling grid process" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling via process" (Expand search), "code code sampling via process" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling via process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling via processo" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling via processos" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling liga process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling via process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling via process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling via process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling via process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.