Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling the coverage" » "coder under sampling the coverage" (Expand search), "coder over sampling the coverage" (Expand search), "coder core sampling the coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling time coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling to coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling theory coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling and coverage" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling the coverage" (Expand search), "code code sampling the coverage" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling the coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling the coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling the coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling the coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.