Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling small process" » "coder under sampling small process" (Expand search), "coder over sampling small process" (Expand search), "coder core sampling small process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling scale process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling stall process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling small press" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling smaw process" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling small process" (Expand search), "code code sampling small process" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling small process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling small process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling small process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling small process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling small process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.