Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling replication protocol" » "coder coder samples replication protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling location protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling selection protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling aplication protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling application protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling application protocols" (Expand search), "coder under sampling replication protocol" (Expand search), "coder over sampling replication protocol" (Expand search), "coder core sampling replication protocol" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling replication protocol" (Expand search), "code code sampling replication protocol" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling replication protocol" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling replication protocol") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling replication protocol\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling replication protocol ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling replication protocol") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.