Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling implication protocols" » "coder coder sampling application protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling duplication protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling amplification protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling replication protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder naming implication protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sample implications protocols" (Expand search), "coder under sampling implication protocols" (Expand search), "coder over sampling implication protocols" (Expand search), "coder core sampling implication protocols" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling implication protocols" (Expand search), "code code sampling implication protocols" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling implication protocols" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling implication protocols") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling implication protocols\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling implication protocols ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling implication protocols") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.