Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling error effect" » "coder under sampling error effect" (Expand search), "coder over sampling error effect" (Expand search), "coder core sampling error effect" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling effort effect" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling errors affect" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling kerr effect" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling tumor effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling error effect" (Expand search), "code code sampling error effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling error effect" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling error effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling error effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling error effect ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling error effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.