Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling efficiency programming" » "coder coder sampling efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling efficiency programmers" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling efficiency programs" (Expand search), "coder coder spending efficiency programming" (Expand search), "coder coder banking efficiency programming" (Expand search), "coder under sampling efficiency programming" (Expand search), "coder over sampling efficiency programming" (Expand search), "coder core sampling efficiency programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling efficiency programming" (Expand search), "code code sampling efficiency programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling efficiency programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling efficiency programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling efficiency programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling efficiency programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling efficiency programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.