Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling bias protocols" » "coder under sampling bias protocols" (Expand search), "coder over sampling bias protocols" (Expand search), "coder core sampling bias protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling trials protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling based protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling burst protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling in protocols" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling bias protocols" (Expand search), "code code sampling bias protocols" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling bias protocols" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling bias protocols") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling bias protocols\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling bias protocols ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling bias protocols") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.