Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling bias protocolo" » "coder under sampling bias protocolo" (Expand search), "coder over sampling bias protocolo" (Expand search), "coder core sampling bias protocolo" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling fixas protocolo" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling fios protocolo" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling mobius protocolo" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling in protocolo" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling bias protocolo" (Expand search), "code code sampling bias protocolo" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling bias protocolo" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling bias protocolo") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling bias protocolo\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling bias protocolo ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling bias protocolo") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.