Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling based protocols" » "coder coder sampling based protocol" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling and protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling care protocols" (Expand search), "coder under sampling based protocols" (Expand search), "coder over sampling based protocols" (Expand search), "coder core sampling based protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling bias protocols" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling based protocols" (Expand search), "code code sampling based protocols" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling based protocols" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling based protocols") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling based protocols\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling based protocols ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling based protocols") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.