Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling an process" » "coder under sampling an process" (Expand search), "coder over sampling an process" (Expand search), "coder core sampling an process" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling an process" (Expand search), "code code sampling an process" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling an process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling and process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling in process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling _ process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling yan process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling mean process" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling plan process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling an process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling an process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling an process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling an process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.