Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling affects processing" » "coder coder sampling affective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling fruits processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling effects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling effect processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling efforts processing" (Expand search), "coder under sampling affects processing" (Expand search), "coder over sampling affects processing" (Expand search), "coder core sampling affects processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling affects processing" (Expand search), "code code sampling affects processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling affects processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling affects processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling affects processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling affects processing ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.