Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling affecting processing" » "coder coder sampling affective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling affects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling harvesting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling effect processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling effects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling resting processing" (Expand search), "coder under sampling affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder over sampling affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder core sampling affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling affecting processing" (Expand search), "code code sampling affecting processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling affecting processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling affecting processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling affecting processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling affecting processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampling affecting processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.