Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder samples text processing" » "coder coder samples meat processing" (Expand search), "coder coder samples event processing" (Expand search), "coder coder samples post processing" (Expand search), "coder code samples text processing" (Expand search), "coder cover samples text processing" (Expand search), "coder modern samples text processing" (Expand search), "coder coder samples kept processing" (Expand search), "coder coder samples at processing" (Expand search), "coder coder samples to processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder samples text processing" (Expand search), "code code samples text processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec samples text processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder samples text processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder samples text processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder samples text processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder samples text processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.