Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder samples by coverage" » "coder code samples by coverage" (Expand search), "coder cover samples by coverage" (Expand search), "coder modern samples by coverage" (Expand search), "coder decoder samples by coverage" (Expand search), "code code samples by coverage" (Expand search), "decoder codec samples by coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder samples bcg coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder samples day coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder samples in coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder samples of coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder samples by coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder samples by coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder samples by coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder samples by coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.