Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampled time processing" » "coder coder sampled the processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampled image processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampled pre processing" (Expand search), "coder code samples time processing" (Expand search), "coder over sampled time processing" (Expand search), "coder cover samples time processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling time processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampled in processing" (Expand search), "coder coder called time processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampled time processing" (Expand search), "code code sampled time processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampled time processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampled time processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampled time processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampled time processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sampled time processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.