Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample with processing" » "coder coder sample pitch processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample fish processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample without processing" (Expand search), "coder modern sample with processing" (Expand search), "coder cover samples with processing" (Expand search), "coder code samples with processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample with processing" (Expand search), "code code sample with processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample with processing" (Expand search), "coder coder samples with processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample with processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample with processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample with processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample with processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.