Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder sample with coverage" » "coder coder sample with average" (Expand search), "coder coder sample with cover" (Expand search), "coder coder sample in coverage" (Expand search), "coder modern sample with coverage" (Expand search), "coder cover samples with coverage" (Expand search), "coder code samples with coverage" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample with coverage" (Expand search), "code code sample with coverage" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample with coverage" (Expand search), "coder coder samples with coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample with coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample with coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample with coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.