Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample variation process" » "coder coder sample radiation process" (Expand search), "coder coder sample evaluation process" (Expand search), "coder coder sample derivation process" (Expand search), "coder coder sample validation process" (Expand search), "coder coder scale variation process" (Expand search), "coder coder angle variation process" (Expand search), "coder modern sample variation process" (Expand search), "coder cover samples variation process" (Expand search), "coder code samples variation process" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample variation process" (Expand search), "code code sample variation process" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample variation process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample variation process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample variation process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample variation process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample variation process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.