Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample using regression" » "coder coder sample and regression" (Expand search), "coder modern sample using regression" (Expand search), "coder cover samples using regression" (Expand search), "coder code samples using regression" (Expand search), "coder coder samples using regression" (Expand search), "coder coder sample in regression" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample using regression" (Expand search), "code code sample using regression" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample using regression" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample using regression") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample using regression\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample using regression ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample using regression") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.