Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample using programming" » "coder coder sample during programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sample single programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sample ranking programming" (Expand search), "coder modern sample using programming" (Expand search), "coder cover samples using programming" (Expand search), "coder code samples using programming" (Expand search), "coder coder samples using programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sample in programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample using programming" (Expand search), "code code sample using programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample using programming" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample using programming") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample using programming\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample using programming ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample using programming") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.