Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample using processing" » "coder coder sample during processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample using geoprocessing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample using process" (Expand search), "coder modern sample using processing" (Expand search), "coder cover samples using processing" (Expand search), "coder code samples using processing" (Expand search), "coder coder samples using processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample in processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample using processing" (Expand search), "code code sample using processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample using processing" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample using processing") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample using processing\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample using processing ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample using processing") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.