Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample spreading process" » "coder coder sample spreading processes" (Expand search), "coder coder sample reading process" (Expand search), "coder coder sample creating process" (Expand search), "coder coder damage spreading process" (Expand search), "coder coder scale spreading process" (Expand search), "coder coder droplet spreading process" (Expand search), "coder modern sample spreading process" (Expand search), "coder cover samples spreading process" (Expand search), "coder code samples spreading process" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample spreading process" (Expand search), "code code sample spreading process" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample spreading process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample spreading process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample spreading process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample spreading process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample spreading process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.