Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample sequence using" » "coder coder simple sequence using" (Expand search), "coder coder simple sequences using" (Expand search), "coder coder simples sequence using" (Expand search), "coder coder sample sequences using" (Expand search), "coder coder sample sequence typing" (Expand search), "coder modern sample sequence using" (Expand search), "coder cover samples sequence using" (Expand search), "coder code samples sequence using" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample sequence using" (Expand search), "code code sample sequence using" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample sequence using" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample sequence using") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample sequence using\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample sequence using ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample sequence using") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.