Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample reduction processes" » "coder coder sample production processes" (Expand search), "coder coder sample education processes" (Expand search), "coder coder sample reduction process" (Expand search), "coder coder damage reduction processes" (Expand search), "coder coder sample selection processes" (Expand search), "coder coder ripple reduction processes" (Expand search), "coder modern sample reduction processes" (Expand search), "coder cover samples reduction processes" (Expand search), "coder code samples reduction processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample reduction processes" (Expand search), "code code sample reduction processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample reduction processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample reduction processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample reduction processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample reduction processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample reduction processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.