Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample in processing" » "coder coder sample grain processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample corn processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample in process" (Expand search), "coder modern sample in processing" (Expand search), "coder cover samples in processing" (Expand search), "coder code samples in processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample in processing" (Expand search), "code code sample in processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample in processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample and processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample of processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sample _ processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample in processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample in processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample in processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample in processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.