Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample formulation processes" » "coder coder sample formation processes" (Expand search), "coder coder sample formulation process" (Expand search), "coder coder sample formalization processes" (Expand search), "coder coder simple formulation processes" (Expand search), "coder coder shampoo formulation processes" (Expand search), "coder coder complex formulation processes" (Expand search), "coder modern sample formulation processes" (Expand search), "coder cover samples formulation processes" (Expand search), "coder code samples formulation processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample formulation processes" (Expand search), "code code sample formulation processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample formulation processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample formulation processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample formulation processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample formulation processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample formulation processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.