Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample formalization processes" » "coder coder sample socialization processes" (Expand search), "coder coder sample organization processes" (Expand search), "coder coder sample normalization process" (Expand search), "coder coder complex normalization processes" (Expand search), "coder coder ampi normalization processes" (Expand search), "coder coder simple formulation processes" (Expand search), "coder modern sample formalization processes" (Expand search), "coder cover samples formalization processes" (Expand search), "coder code samples formalization processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample formalization processes" (Expand search), "code code sample formalization processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample formalization processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample formalization processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample formalization processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample formalization processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample formalization processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.