Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample dependent programming" » "coder coder sample independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder sample dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coder sample element programming" (Expand search), "coder coder simple dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder coder camp dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coder scale dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder modern sample dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder cover samples dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder code samples dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample dependent programming" (Expand search), "code code sample dependent programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample dependent programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample dependent programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample dependent programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample dependent programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.