Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sample allocation problems" » "coder coder sample allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder coder sample location problems" (Expand search), "coder coder sample location problem" (Expand search), "coder coder single allocation problems" (Expand search), "coder coder people allocation problems" (Expand search), "coder coder samples application problems" (Expand search), "coder modern sample allocation problems" (Expand search), "coder cover samples allocation problems" (Expand search), "coder code samples allocation problems" (Expand search), "coder decoder sample allocation problems" (Expand search), "code code sample allocation problems" (Expand search), "decoder codec sample allocation problems" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sample allocation problems") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sample allocation problems\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sample allocation problems ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder sample allocation problems") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.