Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder rolling defective processing" » "coder coder rolling affective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder rolling reactive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder rolling executive processing" (Expand search), "coder coder rolling defects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder involving defective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder rolling direction processing" (Expand search), "coder under rolling defective processing" (Expand search), "coder cold rolling defective processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder rolling defective processing" (Expand search), "code code rolling defective processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec rolling defective processing" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder rolling defective processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder rolling defective processing\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder rolling defective processing ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder rolling defective processing") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.