Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder revisiting modern programming" » "coder coder revisiting order programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting maternal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting modular programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting morin programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting protein programming" (Expand search), "coder coder revisiting covered programming" (Expand search), "coder model revisiting modern programming" (Expand search), "coder after revisiting modern programming" (Expand search), "coder coli revisiting modern programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder revisiting modern programming" (Expand search), "code code revisiting modern programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec revisiting modern programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder revisiting modern programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder revisiting modern programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder revisiting modern programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder revisiting modern programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.